<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: How to be Great: Rising Above the Talent Myth</title> <atom:link href="http://litemind.com/talent-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://litemind.com/talent-myth/</link> <description>Exploring ways to use our minds efficiently.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:33:07 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Don Campbell</title><link>http://litemind.com/talent-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-89426</link> <dc:creator>Don Campbell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:01:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://litemind.com/?p=61#comment-89426</guid> <description>It&#039;s a great point Thomas. I agree with you - to truly master something you have to be passionate about it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a great point Thomas. I agree with you &#8211; to truly master something you have to be passionate about it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas</title><link>http://litemind.com/talent-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-89389</link> <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:08:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://litemind.com/?p=61#comment-89389</guid> <description>Don, this a great piece but I must confess i had to read and read over again, sure u can be good at anything but greatness requires more than determination - it requires one connecting with his true self  which biulds true passion</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, this a great piece<br /> but I must confess i had to read and read over again, sure u can be good at anything but greatness requires more than determination &#8211; it requires one connecting with his true self  which biulds true passion</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Coding Dojo (cz. 2) &#124; Agile Surfing</title><link>http://litemind.com/talent-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-85057</link> <dc:creator>Coding Dojo (cz. 2) &#124; Agile Surfing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:13:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://litemind.com/?p=61#comment-85057</guid> <description>[...] w obsłudze IDE (tylko skróty klawiszowe, refactoring)  Dojo może być formą Deliberate Practice. Dlatego sugerowany format jest [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] w obsłudze IDE (tylko skróty klawiszowe, refactoring)  Dojo może być formą Deliberate Practice. Dlatego sugerowany format jest [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Luciano Passuello</title><link>http://litemind.com/talent-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-74810</link> <dc:creator>Luciano Passuello</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:35:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://litemind.com/?p=61#comment-74810</guid> <description>The &quot;secrets to success&quot; are usually very simple. And usually very hard.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;secrets to success&#8221; are usually very simple. And usually very hard.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eugene @ The Dollar Talk</title><link>http://litemind.com/talent-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-68160</link> <dc:creator>Eugene @ The Dollar Talk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:23:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://litemind.com/?p=61#comment-68160</guid> <description>Thanks for the article.It&#039;s funny how people are looking for shortcuts without realizing that they already know the secret to any success. They just don&#039;t like the secret. The article is very eye-opening.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article.It&#8217;s funny how people are looking for shortcuts without realizing that they already know the secret to any success. They just don&#8217;t like the secret. The article is very eye-opening.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Deb Nystrom</title><link>http://litemind.com/talent-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-66234</link> <dc:creator>Deb Nystrom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:31:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://litemind.com/?p=61#comment-66234</guid> <description>Well, I have a different point of view - as it seems what is written about here may be about success, but not happiness + success tied to capacity and our natural talents.The quote below assumes a &quot;blank slate view/philosophy: - that you can be anything...about these findings is that we can apply them to all areas of our life. Almost any skill is improvable. Giving presentations. Sports. Negotiating. Whatever it is that you do and have a passion for, you can improve and become truly great — if you are willing to put in the work, that is.However, several colleagues of mine has already written blog posts on working within your innate strengths and capacities, so as to build both happiness and success together, with speed and minimal frustration.   Most people just do not have the arm to be a pro baseball pitcher, no matter how long they practice. Most people do not have the pipes to be a world famous operatic star.Two citations two back this up are from Manya Arond Thomas: Excerpt:   Even if we’re pretty good at a lot of things, we will never get the same result, or bang for the buck, if we aren’t naturally wired for that strength, that is, if it isn’t coded into our DNA. The truth is that everything about who we are and what our potential is, is in our blueprint. http://heartofhealthcare.com/blog/Another citation, build on the somewhat controversial work of Elliot Jacques is by Herb Koplowitz  -  It is not easy to understand, but in a nutshell, oversimplified, it is about understanding and assigning people to places in organizations where they can best succeed based on their capacity, including the capacity for planning into the future.  The reference is here based on a strata framework: http://globalro.org/en/blogs/herb-koplowitzs-faq-blog.htmlI&#039;d be interested in what others think about working toward capacity and strengths, vs. the blank slate approach - which can lead to frustration and inefficiency.  Working in your strengths should show results in better work life effectiveness as well as being joyful, energizing, and just plan fun!--Deb</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I have a different point of view &#8211; as it seems what is written about here may be about success, but not happiness + success tied to capacity and our natural talents.</p><p>The quote below assumes a &#8220;blank slate view/philosophy: &#8211; that you can be anything&#8230;about these findings is that we can apply them to all areas of our life. Almost any skill is improvable. Giving presentations. Sports. Negotiating. Whatever it is that you do and have a passion for, you can improve and become truly great — if you are willing to put in the work, that is.</p><p>However, several colleagues of mine has already written blog posts on working within your innate strengths and capacities, so as to build both happiness and success together, with speed and minimal frustration.   Most people just do not have the arm to be a pro baseball pitcher, no matter how long they practice. Most people do not have the pipes to be a world famous operatic star.</p><p>Two citations two back this up are from Manya Arond Thomas:<br /> Excerpt:   Even if we’re pretty good at a lot of things, we will never get the same result, or bang for the buck, if we aren’t naturally wired for that strength, that is, if it isn’t coded into our DNA. The truth is that everything about who we are and what our potential is, is in our blueprint.<br /> <a href="http://heartofhealthcare.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://heartofhealthcare.com/blog/</a></p><p>Another citation, build on the somewhat controversial work of Elliot Jacques is by Herb Koplowitz  &#8211;  It is not easy to understand, but in a nutshell, oversimplified, it is about understanding and assigning people to places in organizations where they can best succeed based on their capacity, including the capacity for planning into the future.  The reference is here based on a strata framework:<br /> <a href="http://globalro.org/en/blogs/herb-koplowitzs-faq-blog.html" rel="nofollow">http://globalro.org/en/blogs/herb-koplowitzs-faq-blog.html</a></p><p>I&#8217;d be interested in what others think about working toward capacity and strengths, vs. the blank slate approach &#8211; which can lead to frustration and inefficiency.  Working in your strengths should show results in better work life effectiveness as well as being joyful, energizing, and just plan fun!</p><p>&#8211;Deb</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Luciano Passuello</title><link>http://litemind.com/talent-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-56071</link> <dc:creator>Luciano Passuello</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:50:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://litemind.com/?p=61#comment-56071</guid> <description>Hi Obinna,Yes, you&#039;re right about that. The only way to put the amount of hours you need to become truly great is by being passionate about it. You can fake passion for a while, but not long enough to become truly great.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Obinna,</p><p>Yes, you&#8217;re right about that. The only way to put the amount of hours you need to become truly great is by being passionate about it. You can fake passion for a while, but not long enough to become truly great.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Obinna</title><link>http://litemind.com/talent-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-55938</link> <dc:creator>Obinna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:38:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://litemind.com/?p=61#comment-55938</guid> <description>As you rightly said &#039;&#039;Whatever it is that you do and have a passion for, you can improve and become truly great — if you are willing to put in the work, that is&#039;&#039; You cannot be passionate about everything you do, you can only get passionate about what you enjoy doing and you enjoy doing what you are gifted in. So when you delibrately practice what you passionate about which stems from what enjoy doing because you are gifted/talented at it, you become graet.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you rightly said &#8221;Whatever it is that you do and have a passion for, you can improve and become truly great — if you are willing to put in the work, that is&#8221; You cannot be passionate about everything you do, you can only get passionate about what you enjoy doing and you enjoy doing what you are gifted in. So when you delibrately practice what you passionate about which stems from what enjoy doing because you are gifted/talented at it, you become graet.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Luciano Passuello</title><link>http://litemind.com/talent-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-47681</link> <dc:creator>Luciano Passuello</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:56:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://litemind.com/?p=61#comment-47681</guid> <description>Hi Sam,Certain inborn physical characteristics definitely can make a difference, especially in sports. (that&#039;s up for debate, but for me that is a bit different than what&#039;s usually referred as  &quot;talent&quot;).On a side note, one thing I always wonder is how many 5&#039;5 basketball players are not as good as they could be --- not because of their height, but simply because the expectations on them are not as high as on taller players&#039;...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sam,</p><p>Certain inborn physical characteristics definitely can make a difference, especially in sports. (that&#8217;s up for debate, but for me that is a bit different than what&#8217;s usually referred as  &#8220;talent&#8221;).</p><p>On a side note, one thing I always wonder is how many 5&#8217;5 basketball players are not as good as they could be &#8212; not because of their height, but simply because the expectations on them are not as high as on taller players&#8217;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sam</title><link>http://litemind.com/talent-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-45706</link> <dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:56:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://litemind.com/?p=61#comment-45706</guid> <description>Dont agree entirely. Dedicated practise is definately required, but there HAS to be a special talent. You dont have many 5&#039;5&quot; tall NBA players or 6&#039; tall jockeys. You dont have many world class sprinters who are NOT black or swimmers who are black. Not everyone is born equal and some are born with a special talent, intelligence, physique which is further improved by training, however they are gifted.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont agree entirely. Dedicated practise is definately required, but there HAS to be a special talent. You dont have many 5&#8217;5&#8243; tall NBA players or 6&#8242; tall jockeys. You dont have many world class sprinters who are NOT black or swimmers who are black.<br /> Not everyone is born equal and some are born with a special talent, intelligence, physique which is further improved by training, however they are gifted.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via litemind.simplusmedia.com

Served from: litemind.com @ 2012-02-09 22:10:08 -->
